![]() |
| The 4th at Bethpage Black |
For context, I played the course about five years ago. I’ll begin by sharing my impressions from five
years back.
I was really love the scale of the golf course. The width of
the tree corridors was massive almost completely taking the trees out of play
on almost every home creating a wonderful backdrop of mature Oaks. The
undulations in the become the focus because your allowed to see so much of the
roll in the land.
Tillinghast has always impressed me with his understanding
of scale and at Bethpage he backed this up with massive bunkering and some really
impressive carry lines from the tee. He also built really wide fairways that
fit the scale and allowed you to take on as little or as much as you dared.
While the golf course was tough as nails, because of how penal it was around
the greens, it was also playable because of all the room away from the
aggressive lines. You could simply tack wide, lay short and play for par/bogie
all day. It was a great version of penal golf.
Forward to Monday
I unimpressed with the new presentation of the course. The
fairways have been narrowed to around 22 yards and while that may be the “appropriate”
set-up for the US Open it made the course one-dimensional. There was no longer
any room off the tee to play a safer line. Even the carry lines were
unattainable because of the lack of width in the fairway, which meant all but
the perfect ran through into the rough. Because there is rough between fairway
and green, where there aren’t super deep bunkers, you couldn’t run an approach
on. The golf course has been reduced to a test of execution, which is the most
boring architecture of all. The round was drudgery and very uninspiring.
I was tremendously disappointed in what the course has
become. The fairway width was the key ingredient to prevent the course from
crossing the line from possible to impossible.

Ian,
ReplyDeleteIt is interesting that you say
"The golf course has been reduced to a test of execution, which is the most boring architecture of all."
and Joe Bausch has very recently shown us an article written by Bobby Jones where he (Jones) says
"The most rigorous demand made upon mechanical skill can never make a hole intriguing."
So you're in fine company when it comes to critiquing a golf hole!
It must be a great disappointment to see the architecture going backwards when there is more and more information out there as to what is constituting good course architecture.
Cheers Colin
Ian,
ReplyDeleteThis is disappointing to hear - I played the course last year (May 2011) and found it to be absolutely brilliant with plenty of width throughout the course.
Do you get the impression that they made the changes in order to prepare for the recent PGA playoff event?